
THE SEVEN POINTS OF EXISTING SADDLE FIT
"Better
Saddles With Good Fit By Schleese "
(Should be checked
using saddle without pad, fittings or rider on top. Horse must stand
squarely on level ground for true picture)
Balance Centre
of saddle (seat area) should lie parallel to the floor on the horse's
back
Straightness Saddle should not fall off to one side when viewed
from back
Tree points should be behind both scapula (shoulder blades)
Wither Clearance Clearance at the withers should be 2-3 fingers
[customer's measurement] between pommel of saddle and horse's withers
(applying slight pressure to saddle)
Gullet Width Wide enough not to interfere with spinal processes
_____F or musculature of horse's back
Present saddle F(ingers) [customer's measurement]
Full Panel Contact Should touch horse's back evenly all the way
from front to back
Should not be hollow or rock
Billet Alignment Billets should hang perpendicular to ground
so that the girth is not angled (i.e., positioned properly)
Shoulder Angle Panel points should be flush with shoulder to
position saddle properly
Principle of Dressage saddle fitting - for women!
It has long been the habit of athletes to follow in the footsteps of
the elite in their particular sport, and to use equipment that the winners
use - regardless of whether a particular brand name or article is actually
appropriate for them or their specific needs.
So it is in our
sport as well - for instance, when Klimke became world champion, the
Hoepfner saddle gained in popularity. Thus also were developed the Passier
Theodorescu, the Stuebben Schultheiss, the Kieffer Udo Lange, etc. etc.
- all models utilized talented, top-notch MALE dressage riders.
This has always
been a bit of a paradox, since the majority of (dressage) riders have
been women - and, until recently, they have not really been in the limelight.
With the event of Nicole Uphoff being first in the world a few years
ago, Passier brought out the "Nicole" saddle (or "Grand
Gilbert" as it is known in Europe" - capitalizing on the success
of the female rider(s) and their growing numbers in the sport as a whole.
There most definitely
IS a difference between male and female - aside from the obvious superficial
physical one, that is!
The recognition
of this fact was actually documented in one of the first articles on
this topic, appearing in Equus magazine in 1989, written by Dr. Deb
Bennett, Ph.D., entitled "Who's built best to ride?" In it
she states "The greatest horse cultures that the world has ever
known, including the Comanches, Sioux and Crow... traditionally built
different types of saddles for men and women. The different saddle designs
reflected...the consistent differences in bony anatomy which exist between
men and women."
One need only examine
a diagram of the pelvis to substantiate this statement. The lower back,
pelvis and thighs in a woman are not constructed like those in a man.
(Fig. 1) Women will tend to have different physical difficulties in
learning to ride, and it follows that riding techniques which work for
men don't always work for women, indeed, many may even physically harm
them.
The hip sockets,
lower back and seat bones of each sex function differently in the saddle,
but to go into the actual technicalities of these anatomical differences
with an explanation of form vs. function would entail a detailed course
in anatomy, so we won't bore you with these descriptions.
In any case, a man's
anatomical construction makes sitting trot and sitting canter easier
for him than for his female counterpart. Add to this the utilization
and availability of a traditionally "male" saddle and it seems
women are hindered doubly -by their own physical attributes and by the
"aids" available.
Specifically, "male"
saddles are built wider in the crotch area and narrower in the seat,
whereas women themselves are built exactly oppositely to these specifications.
(Fig. 2) The top female riders have been able to compensate for these
hindrances with their talents, but the ideal would be to have a saddle
built as they are - narrow in the crotch area and wider in the seat.
The actual "seat"
of the rider, (i.e., position) is also influenced by the upper part
of the thigh. It is easier for a man to rest the inner surface of his
thigh flat against the saddle since the hip sockets face more to the
front than in women. Women's thighbones tend to slant in from hips to
knees - the further back a woman can learn to carry her knees under
her when riding without hollowing her lower back, the better she will
ride. This again is facilitated with the correct build of saddle!
The typical "chair"
seat seen in many women (even top riders) is a direct result of NOT
being able to compensate for what anatomy dictates is the position of
comfort.
There is now a line
of female saddles available on the market, ranging in price from about
$1500-$3000 (CAD).
It is commonplace
in Europe that the rider has long insisted on a saddle to perfectly
fit his or her conformation - if nothing is available "off the
rack" the option is a full or semi-custom made. Little attention
if paid to what is fashionable - important is simply and singly that
it FIT! Slowly this concept seems to be gaining ground here in North
America as well.